Opinion: Apple’s privacy-first approach has downsides but is really paying dividends now<div class="feat-image">
</div><p><a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/homepod/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HomePod[/url] reviews almost universally agreed on <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2018/02/06/homepod-review-roundup-not-so-smart-but-stunning-sound/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">two things[/url]: the speaker sounds incredibly impressive for the size and price, and Apple’s smart speaker is the least-smart one on the market. Both <a href="
https://amzn.to/2GAGUxZ" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Amazon’s Echo[/url] and <a href="
https://store.google.com/product/google_home" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google’s Home[/url] speakers were found to be significantly more capable when it comes to answering questions and carrying out tasks.</p>
<p>This is not, of course, coincidence. Amazon opens its Alexa ‘recipes’ up to any third-party developer, and Google has long snaffled-up as much data as it can to make its smart assistants as capable as possible. Apple, in contrast, carefully controls the personal data available to both itself and to third-party developers …</p>
<p> <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2018/03/30/apple-privacy-policy/#more-526958" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p><div class="feedflare">
<img src="[url]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=_mrf70UxWq8:pNVwz1u3MVM:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img>[/url]
</div><img src="
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/_mrf70UxWq8" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
Source:
Opinion: Apple’s privacy-first approach has downsides but is really paying dividends now
