|
Title: Why fitness apps have been slow to adopt watchOS 2 Post by: HCK on November 09, 2015, 03:00:18 pm Why fitness apps have been slow to adopt watchOS 2
<article> <section class="page"> <p> The Apple Watch’s health and fitness features are among its biggest selling points. Many people have said the watch’s activity-tracking capabilities have helped them lose weight or become more active (http://www.macworld.com/article/2941672/apple-watch-and-fitness-a-couch-potatos-perspective.html). In one instance, the watch’s heart rate sensor actually saved a life (http://abcnews.go.com/US/apple-watch-saved-teens-life/story?id=33944550). I use the watch’s built-in Workout app to track my morning runs, because it’s easier to use and more responsive than any of the third-party running apps for watchOS. But I was hopeful that those apps would improve dramatically with watchOS 2 (http://www.macworld.com/article/2933092/gadgets/these-10-amazing-watchos-2-features-will-make-apple-watch-worth-buying.html), which lets apps run natively on the watch and tap directly into its sensors.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3002250/software-health/why-fitness-apps-have-been-slow-to-adopt-watchos-2.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here[/url]</p></section></article> Source: Why fitness apps have been slow to adopt watchOS 2 (http://www.macworld.com/article/3002250/software-health/why-fitness-apps-have-been-slow-to-adopt-watchos-2.html#tk.rss_all) |