HACKINTOSH.ORG | Macintosh discussion forums

A literal double standard: iPhone memory demands

<article>
   <section class="page">
<p>
You’ve heard, of course, about the Apple double standard, where a different set of rules apply to Apple than every other company out there because…. well, because Apple, that’s why.</p><p>
Writing for Mashable, Stan Schroeder takes the Apple double standard a little too literally.</p><p>
“Hey, 32GB iPhone 7, I already hate you.” (http://mashable.com/2016/07/06/32gb-iphone/) (Tip o’ the antlers to 10at10 (https://twitter.com/iFunny10at10/status/750729219051646976).)</p><p>
Rumors of the base iPhone 7 sporting 32GB aren’t good enough for Schroeder.</p>

<p>
I expect the iPhone 7 to be among the best phones out there, and to achieve that, Apple would finally have to do something unexpected—even if it’s so simple as jumping from 16GB base storage to 64GB for the cheapest option.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3092276/ios/a-literal-double-standard-iphone-memory-demands.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here[/url]</p></section></article>

Source: [

url=http://www.macworld.com/article/3092276/ios/a-literal-double-standard-iphone-memory-demands.html#tk.rss_all]A literal double standard: iPhone memory demands[/url]