HACKINTOSH.ORG | Macintosh discussion forums

Macintosh News => iPhone/iPod/iPad News => Topic started by: HCK on December 07, 2016, 04:05:21 pm



Title: Siding with Samsung, Supreme Court reverses decision on $339 million owed to Apple over iPhone design dispute [U]
Post by: HCK on December 07, 2016, 04:05:21 pm
Siding with Samsung, Supreme Court reverses decision on $339 million owed to Apple over iPhone design dispute

<div class="feat-image">(https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/supreme_court_building_at_dusk.jpg?quality=82&strip=all&strip=all&w=1600&h=1000)</div>
<p>[UPDATE: Apple has responded (https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/06/samsung-apple/) to the news: “The question before the Supreme Court was how to calculate the amount Samsung should pay for their copying. Our case has always been about Samsung’s blatant copying of our ideas, and that was never in dispute. We will continue to protect the years of hard work that has made iPhone the world’s most innovative and beloved product. We remain optimistic that the lower courts will again send a powerful signal that stealing isn’t right.”]</p>
<p>The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Samsung over Apple in the latest chapter of the years-long dispute over iPhone design patents. The decision isn’t totally surprising given some tell-tale signs (https://9to5mac.com/2016/10/12/samsung-apple-patent-trial-supreme-court-2/) ahead of today’s announcement, but it does mean that the case will once again continue in a lower court where a new sum for damages owed will be decided.</p>
<p> <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2016/12/06/supreme-court-samsung-apple-iphone-design-patents-damages/#more-457295" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p>
Filed under: <a href='https://9to5mac.com/category/apple/'>Apple[/url]  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/9to5mac.wordpress.com/457295/" />[/url] <img alt="" border="0" src="https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=457295&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><img alt="" border="0" src="https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=457295&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=Mzp4fxYaxVY:8hGuUywG32g:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?a=Mzp4fxYaxVY:8hGuUywG32g:D7DqB2pKExk)
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/Mzp4fxYaxVY" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Source: Siding with Samsung, Supreme Court reverses decision on $339 million owed to Apple over iPhone design dispute (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~3/Mzp4fxYaxVY/)