Title: FTC again says Qualcomm is a monopoly as Samsung files amicus brief in support Post by: HCK on May 15, 2017, 04:05:21 pm FTC again says Qualcomm is a monopoly as Samsung files amicus brief in support
<div class="feat-image">(https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/qualcomm.jpg?quality=82&strip=all&w=1000&h=500)</div><p>Apple is currently engaged in a high-profile legal battle with Qualcomm centered on patent royalties. Apple struck first back in January (https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/20/apple-qualcomm-lawsuit/) and has since expand its lawsuit (https://9to5mac.com/2017/03/02/apple-qualcomm-lawsuit-uk/) to additional countries (https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/25/apple-qualcomm-iphone-modem-licensing-deal-china-beijing/), while Qualcomm has officially hit back with a countersuit (https://9to5mac.com/2017/04/10/qualcomm-apple-store-lawsuit/).</p> <p>While the Federal Trade Commission had originally stated that Qualcomm had monopolistic like qualities (https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/17/ftc-qualcomm-apple/), the trade group this week has yet again slammed the chip maker…</p> <p> <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2017/05/13/ftc-samsung-apple-monopoly-suit/#more-481711" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p><img alt="" border="0" src="https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=481711&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><img alt="" border="0" src="https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=481711&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><div class="feedflare"> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=fnOhbl-VfeU:GzWj4gfuxLM:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?a=fnOhbl-VfeU:GzWj4gfuxLM:D7DqB2pKExk) </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/fnOhbl-VfeU" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> Source: FTC again says Qualcomm is a monopoly as Samsung files amicus brief in support (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~3/fnOhbl-VfeU/) |