HACKINTOSH.ORG | Macintosh discussion forums

iPhone X Diary: Video performance lags behind photo quality, but it still has one big advantage …

<div class="feat-image">(https://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/grab.jpg?quality=82&strip=all&w=1500)</div><p>I didn’t take long to put the iPhone X camera to the test, <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2017/11/20/iphone-x-diary-camera-review/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">writing last November[/url] that I considered its performance equivalent to a $500-600 camera.</p>
<p>In particular, I was blown away by its low-light performance.</p>

<p>The hardware noise reduction does a stunning job. I’m completely blown away by the lack of noise [

…] That to me is truly stunning quality. There’s no visible grain at all. It’s well exposed (I didn’t adjust this at all). It’s sharp. The colors look great […] This is an absolutely remarkable performance. I’d have had trouble believing that it really was an iPhone shot had I not taken it myself.</p>
<p>I promised then that I’d write a follow-up piece looking at the video performance. That one slipped through the cracks, so I’m rather belatedly correcting that …</p>
<p> <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2018/05/28/iphone-x-review-videos/#more-535034" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p><div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=ASHjFFfjeSk:wMyaRQeLh7U:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?a=ASHjFFfjeSk:wMyaRQeLh7U:D7DqB2pKExk)
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/ASHjFFfjeSk" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Source: iPhone X Diary: Video performance lags behind photo quality, but it still has one big advantage … (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~3/ASHjFFfjeSk/)