Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Hackintosh: AMD or Nvidia for Final Cut Pro X? [Video]  (Read 341 times)
HCK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 79425



« on: May 12, 2017, 04:05:18 pm »

Hackintosh: AMD or Nvidia for Final Cut Pro X? [Video]

<div class="feat-image"></div><p>If you’re looking to build a Hackintosh that can serve as a competent Windows gaming rig on the side, then a build powered by an Nvidia GPU is a good choice. In our most recent Hackintosh build, we paired an Intel i7 6700k with Nvidia’s fastest gaming GPU, the 1080 Ti.</p>
<p>The results weren’t all that surprising. Performance was good in a macOS environment even when using Nvidia’s beta web drivers. Performance was a lot better, though, in a Windows environment, where Pascal GPUs can really thrive.</p>
<p>If you’re interested in building a Hackintosh solely for video editing, however, then an Nvidia-powered GPU option might not be the best choice. Sure, Nvidia GPUs with their CUDA cores are generally superior for editing in an Adobe workflow, but if you’re building a Hackintosh machine solely for video editing, chances are you’re interested in running Final Cut Pro X.</p>
<p> <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2017/05/10/hackintosh-amd-rx-480-vs-nvidia-1080-ti-final-cut-pro-x/#more-480392" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p><img alt="" border="0" src="https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=480392&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><img alt="" border="0" src="https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=480392&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><div class="feedflare">
<img src="[url]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=P-QsoMv1brg:cSRvTEyBz1o:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img>[/url]
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/P-QsoMv1brg" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Source: Hackintosh: AMD or Nvidia for Final Cut Pro X? [Video]
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: