House Judiciary Committee members may file legal brief to back Apple’s view that Congress should decide FBI case<div class="feat-image">
</div>
<p>
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-encryption-amici-idUSKCN0W32WA" target="_blank">Reuters[/url] reports that both Republican and Democratic party members of the House Judiciary Committee support <a href="
http://9to5mac.com/2016/02/23/apple-to-take-encryption-battle-to-congress/" target="_blank">Apple’s view[/url] that Congress, not the courts, should decide the FBI case – and plan to file a legal brief to say so. The committee is responsible for overseeing the administration of justice within federal courts, and most of its members have a legal background.</p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Members of the House Judiciary Committee are considering filing a “friend of the court” brief in Apple’s encryption dispute with the U.S. government to argue that the case should be decided by Congress and not the courts, five sources familiar with the matter said [
…]</span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">They said the brief would come from individual committee members of both Republican and Democratic parties but not the judiciary committee itself. Reuters could not determine which members were likely to be included … </span></p>
<p class="p1"> <a href="
http://9to5mac.com/2016/03/01/congress-apple-fbi-amicus-brief/#more-421228" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p>
Filed under: <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/category/aapl-company/'>AAPL Company[/url], <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/category/ios-devices/'>iOS Devices[/url] Tagged: <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/tag/apple-inc/'>Apple Inc[/url], <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/tag/fbi/'>FBI[/url], <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/tag/federal-bureau-of-investigation/'>Federal Bureau of Investigation[/url], <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/tag/iphone/'>iPhone[/url], <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/tag/san-bernardino/'>San Bernardino[/url], <a href='
http://9to5mac.com/tag/united-states-house-committee-on-the-judiciary/'>United States House Committee on the Judiciary[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/"><img alt="" border="0" src="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/"><img alt="" border="0" src="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/"><img alt="" border="0" src="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/"><img alt="" border="0" src="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/"><img alt="" border="0" src="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/"><img alt="" border="0" src="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/"><img alt="" border="0" src="
http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421228/" />[/url] <img alt="" border="0" src="
[/img]?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=421228&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><img alt="" border="0" src="
[/img]?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=421228&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><div class="feedflare">
<img src="[url]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=CPkuSd6fxdQ:oLgyNSPuBzo:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img>[/url]
</div><img src="
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/CPkuSd6fxdQ" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
Source:
House Judiciary Committee members may file legal brief to back Apple’s view that Congress should decide FBI case