Comment: Intel’s claim about Apple/Qualcomm settlement is clearly a face-saving exercise<div class="feat-image">
</div>
<p>There has been much speculation about what led to the <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/16/apple-qualcomm-settlement/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple/Qualcomm settlement[/url] at the eleventh hour.</p>
<p>Did <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/intel/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Intel[/url] tell Apple it was unable to deliver <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/5g/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">5G[/url] modems by 2020? Did Apple reach its own conclusion that Intel wasn’t up to the job? Or was there some other factor at play that mysteriously led Apple to have a change of heart about <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/15/apple-versus-qualcomm/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a massive lawsuit[/url] centred on <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/qualcomm/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Qualcomm’s[/url] business practices, despite <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/20/apple-qualcomm-lawsuit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">a long history[/url] of vehemently objecting to them … ?</p>
<p> <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/26/apple-qualcomm-settlement-2/#more-590480" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="
https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/26/apple-qualcomm-settlement-2/">Comment: Intel’s claim about Apple/Qualcomm settlement is clearly a face-saving exercise[/url] appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="
https://9to5mac.com">9to5Mac[/url].</p><div class="feedflare">
<img src="[url]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=N0d6WjHvTiI:1TDGWAZMWDM:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img>[/url]
</div><img src="
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/N0d6WjHvTiI" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
Source:
Comment: Intel’s claim about Apple/Qualcomm settlement is clearly a face-saving exercise
