Comment: An Apple wireless charger makes sense even if it isn’t AirPower<div class="feat-image">
</div>
<p>It was reported earlier this week that we might see <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2020/01/29/kuo-forecasts-new-apple-products-coming-this-year-including-wireless-charging-mat-uwb-tags-and-high-end-headphones/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">an Apple wireless charger[/url] after all, despite the <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/airpower/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">AirPower[/url] debacle.</p>
<p>Some have suggested this isn’t a great idea, simply reminding everyone of Apple’s failure to deliver what it originally promised: a single charging mat that allowed you to charge iPhone, AirPods, and Apple Watch by laying them anywhere on the device. Compared to that, an ordinary wireless charger would be a massive climbdown – and what’s the point anyway when <a href="
https://amzn.to/2uRBzOe" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">everyone makes them[/url]… ?</p>
<p> <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2020/01/31/apple-wireless-charger/#more-630758" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="
https://9to5mac.com/2020/01/31/apple-wireless-charger/">Comment: An Apple wireless charger makes sense even if it isn’t AirPower[/url] appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="
https://9to5mac.com">9to5Mac[/url].</p><div class="feedflare">
<img src="[url]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=K3VYsbvbwLo:eYzbpcsZwz0:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img>[/url]
</div><img src="
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/K3VYsbvbwLo" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>
Source:
Comment: An Apple wireless charger makes sense even if it isn’t AirPower