Curiously, the iPhone 16e gets so close to supporting MagSafe<div class="feat-image">
</div><p>The oddest omission in the <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/iphone-16e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">iPhone 16e[/url] is
the la<a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2025/02/19/apple-drops-magsafe-support-on-new-iphone-16e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">c[/url]
k of support for <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/magsafe/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MagSafe[/url]. Indeed, the scale of the surprise at this led <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/aapl/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Apple[/url] to issue <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2025/02/27/apple-explains-why-magsafes-removal-from-iphone-16e-isnt-a-problem/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">an explanation of sorts[/url].</p>
<p>But the position becomes all the stranger, thanks to the discovery that the phone comes
so close to supporting it …</p>
<a data-layer-pagetype="post" data-layer-postcategory="iphone-16e,magsafe" data-layer-viewtype="unknown" data-post-id="992585" href="
https://9to5mac.com/2025/03/04/curiously-the-iphone-16e-gets-so-close-to-supporting-magsafe/#more-992585" class="more-link">moreâ
Curiously, the iPhone 16e gets so close to supporting MagSafe
