|
Title: Review: Photos for OS X is faster than iPhoto but less powerful than Aperture Post by: HCK on April 09, 2015, 03:00:10 am Review: Photos for OS X is faster than iPhoto but less powerful than Aperture
<article> <section class="page"> <p> Last June, Apple announced the impending retirement of iPhoto and Aperture (http://www.macworld.com/article/2375212/apple-retires-aperture-and-iphoto-to-be-replaced-with-photos-for-os-x.html) in favor of Photos for OS X (http://www.apple.com/osx/photos-preview/), a new application it demonstrated briefly at the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC). For most of the intervening 10 months—a long lead time for a company that prefers to ship software soon after announcing it—we didn’t know the new application’s capabilities.</p><p> Would it be friendly enough for casual users but also include the depth to satisfy Aperture’s professional photographers? Would it be like a few other notable Apple software rewrites, like iMovie and Final Cut Pro X, that took bold steps forward at the expense of stripping away features and alienating users?</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2907180/review-photos-for-os-x-is-faster-than-iphoto-but-less-powerful-than-aperture.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here[/url]</p></section></article> Source: Review: Photos for OS X is faster than iPhoto but less powerful than Aperture (http://www.macworld.com/article/2907180/review-photos-for-os-x-is-faster-than-iphoto-but-less-powerful-than-aperture.html#tk.rss_all) |