|
Title: When you assume: Judging Apple’s unannounced products Post by: HCK on November 20, 2016, 04:05:14 pm When you assume: Judging Apple’s unannounced products
<article> <section class="page"> <p>It’s time to have fun with assumptions, both past an present! Apple’s in a sales decline and there’s no help for the future because all Apple products arrive pre-failed.</p><p>Writing for Barron’s, Alex Eule says “Apple iGlass is a Great Name, But It Won’t Help the Stock.” (http://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-iglass-is-a-great-name-but-it-wont-help-the-stock-1479230805?mod=yahoobarrons&ru=yahoo&yptr=yahoo) (Tip o’ the antlers to Philip Speicher (https://twitter.com/mr_lawesome/status/798623082491428865).)</p><p>Get it? iGlass? Eye Glass?</p><p>Eule wasn’t the only one to go to the iWell to dredge up that iGem. Gizmodo did, too (http://gizmodo.com/5923321/would-apple-iglass-be-better-than-googles-glasses). Of course, no one uses the singular “eyeglass” unless they’re a steampunk cosplayer looking for their missing monocle. So, we shall have to agree to disagree that it’s a “great” name. Probably doesn’t matter, though, since Apple stopped naming things with a lower-case “i” in the front six years ago.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3142022/ios/when-you-assume-judging-apple-s-unannounced-products.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here[/url]</p></section></article> Source: When you assume: Judging Apple’s unannounced products (http://www.macworld.com/article/3142022/ios/when-you-assume-judging-apple-s-unannounced-products.html#tk.rss_all) |