|
Title: Angry Birds Blast isn't explosively fun, but it's not bad either Post by: HCK on January 20, 2017, 04:05:13 pm Angry Birds Blast isn't explosively fun, but it's not bad either
<article> <section class="page"> <p> Free-to-play games often look appealing, but it’s difficult to know at a glance whether the business model is insidious and fun ruining, or reasonable and worth pumping a few bucks into. With Freemium Field Test (http://www.macworld.com/column/freemium-field-test/), we’ll take a recent free-to-play iOS game, put it through its paces, and let you know if it’s really worth your time (and money).</p><p> Angry Birds mania is seemingly past its prime, although the nearly $350 million worldwide gross of last year’s The Angry Birds Movie seemingly ensures that the franchise will keep hanging around for a while. In recent years, however, rather than keep iterating upon the familiar pull-and-fling formula (aside from the solid Angry Birds 2 (http://www.macworld.com/article/2969392/ios-apps/freemium-field-test-angry-birds-2-is-a-somewhat-muddled-return-to-form.html)), Rovio has mostly delivered an array of spinoffs that bear little resemblance to the main games. </p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3156015/ios/angry-birds-blast-isnt-explosively-fun-but-its-not-bad-either.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here[/url]</p></section></article> Source: Angry Birds Blast isn't explosively fun, but it's not bad either (http://www.macworld.com/article/3156015/ios/angry-birds-blast-isnt-explosively-fun-but-its-not-bad-either.html#tk.rss_all) |