|
Title: Why Apple doesn’t need a ‘revolutionary’ iPhone Post by: HCK on February 12, 2017, 04:05:14 pm Why Apple doesn’t need a ‘revolutionary’ iPhone
<article> <section class="page"> <p> In Apple’s most recent earnings call, Tim Cook revealed (http://www.macworld.com/article/3163518/apple-phone/apples-q1-iphone-7-slays-in-a-record-setting-784-billion-quarter.html) that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus set a record for the most iPhone sold in a single quarter. Together, these iPhones sold over 78 million units and made over $54 billion, ending Apple’s three consecutive quarters of declining iPhone sales.</p><p> In this week’s episode of The iPhone Show (http://www.macworld.com/column/the-iphone-show/), let’s explore what the the success of the iPhone 7 means for the future of the iPhone. After all, the iPhone 7 was originally criticized for being “boring.” But if a boring iPhone can still make billions of dollars, does Apple have any motivation to take a risk and create a “revolutionary” device?</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3167543/ios/why-apple-doesnt-need-a-revolutionary-iphone.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here[/url]</p></section></article> Source: Why Apple doesn’t need a ‘revolutionary’ iPhone (http://www.macworld.com/article/3167543/ios/why-apple-doesnt-need-a-revolutionary-iphone.html#tk.rss_all) |