|
Title: Insubstantial contributions: The iPhone X’s failure to dominate Post by: HCK on January 28, 2018, 04:05:11 pm Insubstantial contributions: The iPhone X’s failure to dominate
<article> <section class="page"> <p>Shocking news today as the iPhone X has failed to meet the dunderheaded and completely fabricated expectations of serially wrong pundits, signaling its utter failure.</p><p>Writing for the Forbes contributor network and expired pimento loaf factory outlet, Ewan Spence declares the <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2018/01/23/apple-iphonex-iphone8-success-failure-timcook/#46f73e0d641f" rel="nofollow">“iPhone X Defeated As Tim Cook Steals Victory Away With The iPhone 8.”[/url] (Tip o’ the antlers to <a href="https://twitter.com/jonyiveparody" rel="nofollow">@JonyIveParody[/url].)</p><p>Headlines, they’re what’s for blarrrrrrgh.</p><p>The iPhone X was defeated, you see… by other iPhones. It is a wonder Tim Cook is still employed.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3250302/apple-phone/insubstantial-contributions-the-iphone-x-s-failure-to-dominate.html#jump">To read this article in full, please click here[/url]</p></section></article> Source: Insubstantial contributions: The iPhone X’s failure to dominate (https://www.macworld.com/article/3250302/apple-phone/insubstantial-contributions-the-iphone-x-s-failure-to-dominate.html#tk.rss_all) |