HACKINTOSH.ORG | Macintosh discussion forums

Comment: Rumored 16-inch MacBook Pro keeps the 17-inch dream alive

<p><img class="type:primaryImage" src="https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2019/02/16-inch-MacBook-Pro.png?w=1500"></p>
<p>I’ve been calling on Apple to <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2014/05/30/opinion-its-time-to-bring-back-the-mobile-professionals-workhorse-the-macbook-pro-17/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">bring back the 17-inch MacBook Pro[/url] for many years now. Sometimes there’s just no substitute for physical screen size when it comes to things like photo and video editing, and even in more mundane use, you can get a significant productivity boost from having multiple windows visible at the same time.</p>
<p>I’ve suggested before that <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2016/04/12/opinion-apple-mac-lineup-range/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">14- and 16-inch machines[/url] might be the sweet-spot, and noted Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo yesterday suggested that the larger of the two may well be on the way …</p>
<p> <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2019/02/18/16-inch-macbook-pro/#more-580113" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://9to5mac.com/2019/02/18/16-inch-macbook-pro/">Comment: Rumored 16-inch MacBook Pro keeps the 17-inch dream alive[/url] appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://9to5mac.com">9to5Mac[/url].</p><div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=LcLPTVr5f_o:0Wtli5smwG4:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?a=LcLPTVr5f_o:0Wtli5smwG4:D7DqB2pKExk)
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/LcLPTVr5f_o" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Source: Comment: Rumored 16-inch MacBook Pro keeps the 17-inch dream alive (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~3/LcLPTVr5f_o/)