|
Title: How to perform backups more complicated than Time Machine allows Post by: HCK on December 15, 2019, 04:05:15 pm How to perform backups more complicated than Time Machine allows
<article> <section class="page"> <p>Time Machine is a great, baseline, no-fuss archiving solution for macOS. While it has many drawbacks and can be fussy, it’s far better than not having a backup and it works generally well for the vast majority of Mac owners. It’s a great solution for family members who otherwise don’t back up. (Especially coupled with convincing them to subscribe to or giving them Backblaze or another highly related secure, automated, hosted backup service.)</p><p>If you’re frustrated with Time Machine’s limitations, however, you have other options. <a href="https://www.econtechnologies.com/chronosync/overview.html" rel="nofollow">Econ Technologies’ ChronoSync[/url] always sits at the top of my list. It’s not per se backup software. Rather, it’s an exhaustive solution for synchronizing files between two local, two remote, or one local and remote location. Backup and archiving is just one of its many features.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3488511/how-to-schedule-backups-more-complicated-than-time-machine-allows.html#jump">To read this article in full, please click here[/url]</p></section></article> Source: How to perform backups more complicated than Time Machine allows (https://www.macworld.com/article/3488511/how-to-schedule-backups-more-complicated-than-time-machine-allows.html#tk.rss_all) |