HACKINTOSH.ORG | Macintosh discussion forums

Comment: A fully wireless iPhone is more likely than a Smart Connector

<div class="feat-image">(https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2020/05/A-fully-wireless-iPhone-is-inevitable.jpeg?quality=82&strip=all&w=1000)</div>
<p>There has long been debate about the future of the <a href="https://9to5mac.com/guides/lightning/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lightning[/url] port in the <a href="https://9to5mac.com/guides/iphone/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">iPhone[/url]. Will Apple stick to this, replace it with <a href="https://9to5mac.com/guides/usb-c/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">USB-C[/url], or move straight to a fully wireless iPhone — one without any ports at all?</p>
<p>There’s fresh discussion today prompted by a claim that Apple will do none of these things, and instead use a <a href="https://9to5mac.com/guides/smart-connector/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Smart Connector[/url] on the iPhone 13…</p>
<p> <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2020/05/26/fully-wireless-iphone/#more-648023" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://9to5mac.com/2020/05/26/fully-wireless-iphone/">Comment: A fully wireless iPhone is more likely than a Smart Connector[/url] appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://9to5mac.com">9to5Mac[/url].</p><div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=r688CMPAInc:WPuKtFxWvsE:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img> (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?a=r688CMPAInc:WPuKtFxWvsE:D7DqB2pKExk)
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/r688CMPAInc" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Source: Comment: A fully wireless iPhone is more likely than a Smart Connector (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~3/r688CMPAInc/)