HACKINTOSH.ORG | Macintosh discussion forums

Is Apple making a faster AirPort Express?

<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even" property="content:encoded"><p><a href='http://www.imore.com/apple-making-faster-airport-express' title="Is Apple making a faster AirPort Express?"><img src='http://www.imore.com/sites/imore.com/files/styles/large_wm_brw/public/field/image/2014/03/airport_express_modem_hero.jpg?itok=StSCnu1P' />[/url]</p> <p>A customer in the store last weekend asked me if Apple had updated the AirPort Express (http://www.imore.com/airport-express) yet. He said that he wanted another one but wasn't willing to buy it until they added 802.11ac to it. It's been almost a year and a half since Apple released the AirPort Extreme with 802.11ac networking, after all. There are some things to consider, however. Read on for details.</p> <!--break--> <p>The AirPort Express is Apple's $99 router. It's great for small apartments or areas that don't have a lot of users. It also has a audio out jack that can be connected to an audio source like a stereo receiver, so it can act as an AirPlay receiver too — you can use the AirPort Express to stream audio to different parts of your house. What's more, it can also be used to extend your existing AirPort Extreme's Wi-Fi network to locations where the signal just doesn't reach.</p> <p>The AirPort Express was first introduced in 2004 as a miniature 802.11g router, and went almost four years before being refreshed with 802.11n networking. That model lasted another four years until 2012, when the redesigned, smaller AirPort Express debuted. So if the AirPort Express's history is any indication, we're about mid-cycle in the AirPort Express' life span. But there's a wrinkle to this worth understanding.</p> <p>When Apple's latest-model AirPort Extreme debuted in 2013, it was a radically different physical shape than the AirPort Extreme base stations that preceded it. It was shorter in length and width but much, much taller than before, with the Ethernet and USB ports on its back stacked vertically instead of horizontally.</p> <p>This mini-tower design isn't just an odd design embellishment from Apple made to differentiate the 2013 AirPort Extreme from its predecessors. As with so many things from Apple, form follows function in the AirPort Extreme's design: It's tall because inside it has a much more complicated antenna array than older AirPort Extreme models. The antenna design is there to accommodate the greater bandwidth usage of 802.11ac and various other requirements.</p> <p>The AirPort Express, at least in its current form, isn't encumbered by those restrictions, as it's still 802.11n, so it's a lot smaller. Almost pocket-sized really. Yang to the Apple TV's black yin, from a design perspective.</p> <p>Smaller 802.11ac routers do exist. Xiaomi apparently took a page from Apple's Magic Trackpad design when it designed the Mi Wi-Fi Mini (http://www.mi.com/miwifimini) (that page is in Chinese). It's an 802.11ac router intended for mobile use — like plugging into the Ethernet jack at a hotel so you can work from your bed, or somewhere else where you might need to temporarily set up a Wi-Fi signal.</p> <p>Xiaomi's little 802.11ac router has two raisable antennas to improve signal strength. But with only two antennas and a lower-power design, that router has more more limited signal strength and bandwidth than the AirPort Extreme does — just because it's 802.11ac doesn't mean it's necessarily better than a good 802.11n router.</p> <p>Apple isn't willing to compromise user experience just to accommodate a smaller design, so I don't think we'll see a device like that, but at least it can be done. Most of the 802.11ac routers out there are much bigger, clunkier designs; Apple's made the AirPort Extreme as elegant and compact as it can, given the current technology constraints.</p> <p>One of the main reasons my customers get the AirPort Express is to extend the reach of their Wi-Fi network to corners of their house where the AirPort Extreme just doesn't reach. Extend it does, but only at the slower speeds of 802.11n. But that network extension isn't limited to the AirPort Express — you can do the same thing with an AirPort Extreme too. Obviously you'll pay twice as much as you would with an AirPort Express, but if you're concerned about speed and you want to stick with Apple, it's the only option for you at the moment.</p> <h2>Your network?</h2> <p>Do you go with Apple-branded routers, or is your network set up using something different? Are you also waiting for an 802.11ac-equipped AirPort Express? Let me know.</p> </div></div></div><div id="comment-wrapper-nid-27254"></div><img width='1' height='1' src='http://tipb.com.feedsportal.com/c/33998/f/616881/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/mf.gif' border='0'/><br clear='all'/>

<a href="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/rc/1/rc.htm" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/rc/1/rc.img" border="0"/>[/url]
<a href="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/rc/2/rc.htm" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/rc/2/rc.img" border="0"/>[/url]
<a href="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/rc/3/rc.htm" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/rc/3/rc.img" border="0"/>[/url]

<img src="http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/a2.img" border="0"/> (http://da.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/a2.htm)<img width="1" height="1" src="http://pi.feedsportal.com/r/206158103724/u/49/f/616881/c/33998/s/3ec1bca1/sc/4/a2t.img" border="0"/><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~4/4ReGDqxGi-4" height="1" width="1"/>

Source: Is Apple making a faster AirPort Express? (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/4ReGDqxGi-4/story01.htm)