Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Apple follows up earlier motion to vacate FBI court order with formal objection in order to guarantee appeal  (Read 507 times)
HCK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 79425



« on: March 02, 2016, 09:00:23 pm »

Apple follows up earlier motion to vacate FBI court order with formal objection in order to guarantee appeal

<div class="feat-image"></div>
<p>Shortly after yesterday’s <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2016/03/01/apple-fbi-house-hearing-live-stream/" target="_blank">Congressional hearing[/url], Apple filed a formal objection to the court order instructing it to <a href="http://9to5mac.com/tag/fbi/" target="_blank">assist the FBI[/url] in breaking into an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters.</p>
<p>Apple had <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2016/02/25/apple-official-court-response-fbi-encryption/" target="_blank">previously filed[/url] its mandatory response, in which it called for the court to vacate the order. This was a 65-page detailed document setting out the reasons the company believed the order should not have been granted. The document filed yesterday was rather shorter …</p>
<p> <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2016/03/02/apple-fbi-appeal-objection/#more-421397" class="more-link">more…[/url]</p>
Filed under: <a href='http://9to5mac.com/category/aapl-company/'>AAPL Company[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/category/ios-devices/'>iOS Devices[/url] Tagged: <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/apple-inc/'>Apple Inc[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/court-order/'>court order[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/encryption/'>Encryption[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/fbi/'>FBI[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/federal-bureau-of-investigation/'>Federal Bureau of Investigation[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/privacy/'>privacy[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/san-bernardino/'>San Bernardino[/url], <a href='http://9to5mac.com/tag/united-states-district-court-for-the-central-district-of-california/'>United States District Court for the Central District of California[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/" />[/url] <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/9to5mac.wordpress.com/421397/" />[/url] <img alt="" border="0" src="[/img]?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=421397&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><img alt="" border="0" src="[/img]?host=9to5mac.com&blog=22754319&post=421397&subd=9to5mac&ref=&feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><div class="feedflare">
<img src="[url]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/9To5Mac-MacAllDay?i=egqC4e9Hb6w:pwVD-XuBIBE:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img>[/url]
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/9To5Mac-MacAllDay/~4/egqC4e9Hb6w" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Source: Apple follows up earlier motion to vacate FBI court order with formal objection in order to guarantee appeal
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: