HBO Max still isn't supersized enough to attract cord-cutters<article>
<section class="page">
<p>When HBO Max launched in late May, I was excited despite all the
branding confusion around the service.</p><p>Whereas HBO focused on a small number of highbrow shows and movies, HBO Max offers many more movies and shows from WarnerMedia and beyond. It has the potential to be a true rival to Netflix, with a broad catalog that’s worth keeping year-round instead of just whenever the best HBO shows arrive.</p><p>Now that HBO Max is here, I can see the reality: HBO Max is a better value than HBO used to be, but its catalog is still dwarfed by Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Hulu. That probably won’t change anytime soon, as parent company AT&T continues to spread its content catalog across multiple streaming services instead of investing in just one. AT&T has claimed to be <a href="
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/media/hbo-max-analysis/index.html" rel="nofollow">”all in” on HBO Max[/url], but as with so many of the company’s other streaming video endeavors, this one seems like another half measure.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/3562783/hbo-max-still-isnt-supersized-enough-to-attract-cord-cutters.html#jump">To read this article in full, please click here[/url]</p></section></article>
Source:
HBO Max still isn't supersized enough to attract cord-cutters
