Apple’s fight against iPhone sideloading was pointless at best, harmful at worst<div class="feat-image">
</div>
<p><a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/aapl/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Apple[/url] put up a lengthy fight against being forced to allow <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/iphone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">iPhone[/url] sideloading – the ability for owners to install apps directly from a developer’s website, in the same way we can a Mac app.</p>
<p>The company even went as far as arguing that Macs weren’t safe from malware because users can download apps directly. But ultimately the battle was pointless, and may even have been harmful …</p>
<p> <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2023/04/18/iphone-sideloading/#more-877281" data-post-id="877281" data-layer-pagetype="post" data-layer-postcategory="aapl,antitrust,ios-17,opinion" data-layer-viewtype="unknown" class="more-link">moreâ
https://9to5mac.com/2023/04/18/iphone-sideloading/">Apple’s fight against iPhone sideloading was pointless at best, harmful at worst[/url] appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="
https://9to5mac.com">9to5Mac[/url].</p>
Source:
Apple’s fight against iPhone sideloading was pointless at best, harmful at worst
