I think Apple should take this radical approach to the new Siri<div class="feat-image">
</div><p>Apple has <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2025/03/13/apple-commenter-john-gruber-launches-blistering-attack-on-rotten-apple-over-siri-vaporware/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">been roundly criticized[/url] for falling behind in AI, and for its rather disastrous <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/guides/apple-intelligence/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Apple Intelligence[/url] launch in which it <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2025/03/07/apple-intelligence-personal-siri-delayed/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">was forced to admit[/url] it had <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2025/03/07/apple-pulls-ad-that-showed-siri-being-useful-after-delaying-feature-that-could-make-siri-useful/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">promised things it couldn’t deliver[/url].</p>
<p>The second criticism is valid, the first only partly so. But a new report suggests that Apple’s path to delivering on its AI promises may be a radical one: <a href="
https://9to5mac.com/2025/12/30/apple-may-see-the-future-of-llms-very-differently-than-most-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">abandoning work on its own model[/url]. I do now think that’s absolutely the right thing to do … </p>
<a data-layer-pagetype="post" data-layer-postcategory="aapl,apple-intelligence,opinion,siri" data-layer-viewtype="unknown" data-post-id="1034074" href="
https://9to5mac.com/2026/01/05/i-think-apple-should-take-this-radical-approach-to-the-new-siri/#more-1034074" class="more-link">moreâ
I think Apple should take this radical approach to the new Siri
